4.7 Article

Effect of annealing temperature on the microstructure and superelasticity of Ti-19Zr-10Nb-1Fe alloy

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.02.031

Keywords

Ti-Zr-Nb-Fe; Microstructure; Mechanical properties; Superelasticity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51371016]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [YWF-16-BJ-J-49]
  3. Industrial Transformation & Upgrading of Strong Base Project of China [TC150B5C0/03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of annealing temperature on the microstructure, mechanical properties and superelasticity of Ti-19Zr-10Nb-lFe alloys were investigated. The as-rolled alloy was annealed at temperatures between 823 K and 1173 K. The alloy annealed at 823 K consisted of major beta and partial a phases. Equiaxed beta grains with nanoscale omega precipitates were observed in the alloys annealed above 873 K. The alpha/beta transus temperature and recrystallization temperature of Ti-19Zr-10Nb-lFe alloy were both determined to be between 823 K and 873 K. The alloy annealed at 823 K exhibits a higher ultimate tensile strengthen and a lower fracture strain than other alloys, due to the residual work hardening, and the coarse and non-uniformly distributed a precipitates. Ti-19Zr-10Nb-lFe alloys annealed at 873 K and 973 K exhibited superelasticity in tension due to the stress induced martensitic transformation. However, no obvious superelasticity can be observed during the tensile deformation of the alloys annealed at 823 K or 1173 K, implying the suppression of stress-induced martensite transformation by high-density dislocations or increased beta grain size, respectively. The alloy annealed at 873 K exhibited a good combination of large elongation of similar to 24.8%, low Young's modulus of similar to 58 GPa, high ultimate tensile stress of similar to 703 MPa and the maximum superelasticity of similar to 3.7%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available