4.7 Article

Adiabatic shear behaviors in rolled and annealed pure titanium subjected to dynamic impact loading

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.011

Keywords

Shear bands; Titanium; Microstructure; Twinning; Dynamic recrystallization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [50871125]
  2. National Key Laboratory Foundation for Powder Metallurgy of Central South University [2008112047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hat-shaped samples cut from rolled and annealed titanium plates were prepared to explore the adiabatic shear behaviors subjected to high-strain-rate deformation operated via Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar. The dynamic shear response calculation reveals that dynamic deformation processes of both state samples can be divided in similar three stages but rolled sample shows a higher susceptibility of adiabatic shear localization compared with the annealed one. Optical microscopy and electronic backscatter diffraction technique (EBSD) were used to systematically analyze the microstructure and texture characteristics. The results show that adiabatic shear bands form in both state samples and rotational dynamic recrystallization (RDRX) occurs within shear area and results in the formation of ultrafine equiaxed grains. Furthermore, ultrafine equiaxed grains within adiabatic shear bands have the same texture feature that < 11-20 > direction and {10-10} plane parallel to macro local shear direction and shear plane respectively. In the deformation region around the shear band, {10-12} < 1011 > tensile and {11-22} < 11-2-3 > compressive two types twins are observed in both state samples and {10-12} < 1011 > tensile twins are more frequently observed in rolled sample. In the rolled sample, {10-12} < 1011 > tensile twins are more likely to happen in the hat-brim side than the hat -body side due to the difference of stress state in two sides.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available