3.8 Article

Evaluation of the effect of storage time and disinfectant solutions on the dimensional accuracy of impression materials with digital radiography

Journal

DENTAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 67-74

Publisher

POLISH DENTAL SOC
DOI: 10.17219/dmp/101649

Keywords

dimensional accuracy; storage time; impression material; digital radiography; disinfection solution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The dimensional accuracy of impression materials has been evaluated for a long time, but thus far, digital radiography has not been used for this purpose. The dimensional accuracy of impression materials is very important for the final adaptation of dental prostheses. Objectives. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different disinfectant solutions and storage times on the dimensional stability of different impression materials by means of digital radiography. Material and methods. Polyether (PE), hydrocolloid (IH), condensation silicone (CS), and addition silicone (AS) materials were used for preparing impressions, taken from an acrylic master model with 2 vertical and 2 horizontal reference points. Water (W), sodium hypochlorite (SH) and a disinfectant solution without aldehyde (Z) were applied on the impressions. Half of the impressions were poured over immediately and half of them - 1 day after. Digital radiography was used to determine the dimensional accuracy of the impression materials. The data was analyzed with a variance analysis and Tukey's multiple comparison test. Results. While PE showed the smallest dimensional changes, IH showed the greatest in all lines. Applying SH and pouring 1 day after caused the greatest dimensional changes in all impression materials. Conclusions. Different disinfectant solutions and storage times had a different effect on the impressions, but the dimensional changes were clinically acceptable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available