4.7 Article

High-temperature tensile deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of Ti55 titanium alloy

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.10.095

Keywords

Titanium alloys; Deformation behavior; Deformation mechanism; Dynamic recrystallization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High temperature tensile and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) techniques were combined to perform a systematic investigation for the hot deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of the Ti55 alloy. Under temperatures ranging from 885 to 935 degrees C and stain rates of 8.3x 10(-4) s(-1)-1.33x 10(-2) s(-1), all the flow curves of the Ti55 alloy exhibit similar behaviors: after reaching the peak flow stress, the curves enter into a softening stage and then remain a steady level, where the maximum. superplastic elongation of 987% indicates good superplasticity. Detailed microstructure characterizations under different deformation stages show that the grain aspect ratios decrease greatly and the fractions of high angle boundaries (> 15 degrees) increase rapidly at the softening stage. These observations are attributed to the dynamic recrystallization, in which low angle grain boundaries (< 5 degrees) evolve into high angle boundaries and the formation of equiaxed grains is accelerated. In contrast, no obvious changes in either the grain aspect ratios or the fractions of high angle boundaries occur at the steady flow stage, while the initial texture gradually disappears and the Schmid factor increases with the further straining. At this stage, the deformation mechanism is grain boundary sliding and grain rotation would accommodate the process of grain boundary sliding. Moreover, the main softening mode responsible for the flow behaviors has been identified as discontinuous dynamic recrystallization, which completely neutralized the effect of work hardening at the quasi stable deformation stage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available