3.8 Article

Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques

Journal

SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 236-241

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.01.001

Keywords

Fiber post; Endodontic treated teeth; Resin cement; Micro-computed tomography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The study was built around the objective of determining the variances in the gap and void formation around cemented prefabricated fiber posts with two different cementation materials and techniques with micro-computed tomography (mu CT). Methods: Standardized acrylic resin roots (N = 40) with prefabricated fiber posts (RelyX (TM) Fiber Post 3D) were split into four sets (n = 10) based on many types of cementation materials and techniques. In the first group, resin cement (RelyX (TM) Unicem) was inserted to the canals via root canal tips. In the second group, the same cement was injected, and a microbrush was used to distribute the cement inside the canal. In the third group, dual polymerizing resin cement (Multi-Core (R) Flow) was injected into the canals by using root canal tips. In the fourth group, the same cement was injected, and a microbrush was used to distribute the cement inside the canal. The gap and void formation in the cement and the root canals was evaluated with mu CT. IBM SPSS Statistics was used to perform the statistical evaluation, then the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of nor-mality and Kruskal-Wallis H test to compare these variables with respect to the all groups significant difference (a = 0.05). Results: The study outlined no difference of significance when evaluating the gap and void formation within the experimental groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: There was a certain amount of void and gap formation inside all of the tested specimens. However, no significant variances were found. (C) 2019 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available