4.6 Article

Still Missing Dark Matter: KCWI High-resolution Stellar Kinematics of NGC1052-DF2

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 874, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0e8c

Keywords

galaxies: individual (NGC1052-DF2); galaxies: kinematics and dynamics

Funding

  1. STScI [HST-GO-13682, HST-GO-14644]
  2. NSF [AST-1312376, AST-1613582, NSF AST-1616170]
  3. NASA Keck PI Data Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The velocity dispersion of the ultra diffuse galaxy NGC1052-DF2 was found to be sigma(gc) = 7.8(-2.2)(+5.2) km s(-1), much lower than expected from the stellar mass-halo mass relation and nearly identical to the expected value from the stellar mass alone. This result was based on the radial velocities of 10 luminous globular clusters that were assumed to be associated with the galaxy. A more precise measurement is possible from high-resolution spectroscopy of the diffuse stellar light. Here we present an integrated spectrum of the diffuse light of NGC1052-DF2 obtained with the Keck Cosmic Web Imager (KCWI), with an instrumental resolution of sigma(instr) approximate to 12 km s(-1). The systemic velocity of the galaxy is nu(sys) = 1805 +/- 1.1 km s(-1), in very good agreement with the average velocity of the globular clusters ( = 1803 +/- 2 km s(-1)). There is no evidence for rotation within the KCWI field of view. We find a stellar velocity dispersion of sigma(stars) = 8.5(-3.1)(+2.3) km s(-1), consistent with the dispersion that was derived from the globular clusters. The implied dynamical mass within the half-light radius r(1/2) - 2.7 kpc is M-dyn - (1.3 +/- 0.8) x 10(8) M-circle dot, similar to the stellar mass within that radius (M-stars = (1.0 +/- 0.2) x 10(8) M-circle dot). With this confirmation of the low velocity dispersion of NGC1052-DF2, the most urgent question is whether this missing dark matter problem is unique to this galaxy or applies more widely.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available