4.7 Article

Stoichiometric homeostasis predicts plant species dominance, temporal stability, and responses to global change

Journal

ECOLOGY
Volume 96, Issue 9, Pages 2328-2335

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/14-1897.1

Keywords

climate change; climate extremes; drought; ecological stoichiometry; global change; Konza Prairie Biological Station, Kansas, USA; nitrogen deposition; tallgrass prairie; vascular plants

Categories

Funding

  1. Konza Prairie National Science Foundation Long Term Ecological Research Program
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41320104002]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology [1440484] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1257174] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Why some species are consistently more abundant than others, and predicting how species will respond to global change, are fundamental questions in ecology. Long-term observations indicate that plant species with high stoichiometric homeostasis for nitrogen (H-N), i.e., the ability to decouple foliar N levels from variation in soil N availability, were more common and stable through time than low-H-N species in a central U.S. grassland. However, with nine years of nitrogen addition, species with high H-N decreased in abundance, while those with low H-N increased in abundance. In contrast, in climate change experiments simulating a range of forecast hydrologic changes, e.g., extreme drought (two years), increased rainfall variability (14 years), and chronic increases in rainfall (21 years), plant species with the highest H-N were least responsive to changes in soil water availability. These results suggest that H-N may be predictive of plant species success and stability, and how plant species and ecosystems will respond to global-change-driven alterations in resource availability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available