4.7 Article

Rigorous home range estimation with movement data: a new autocorrelated kernel density estimator

Journal

ECOLOGY
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages 1182-1188

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/14-2010.1

Keywords

autocorrelation; Brownian bridge; home range; kernel density; minimum convex polygon; Mongolian gazelle, Procapra gutturosa; tracking data; utilization distribution

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [ABI 1062411]
  2. Robert Bosch Foundation
  3. Smithsonian Institution
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [GRANTS:13758887, 1062411] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantifying animals' home ranges is a key problem in ecology and has important conservation and wildlife management applications. Kernel density estimation (KDE) is a workhorse technique for range delineation problems that is both statistically efficient and nonparametric. KDE assumes that the data are independent and identically distributed (IID). However, animal tracking data, which are routinely used as inputs to KDEs, are inherently autocorrelated and violate this key assumption. As we demonstrate, using realistically autocorrelated data in conventional KDEs results in grossly underestimated home ranges. We further show that the performance of conventional KDEs actually degrades as data quality improves, because autocorrelation strength increases as movement paths become more finely resolved. To remedy these flaws with the traditional KDE method, we derive an autocorrelated KDE (AKDE) from first principles to use autocorrelated data, making it perfectly suited for movement data sets. We illustrate the vastly improved performance of AKDE using analytical arguments, relocation data from Mongolian gazelles, and simulations based upon the gazelle's observed movement process. By yielding better minimum area estimates for threatened wildlife populations, we believe that future widespread use of AKDE will have significant impact on ecology and conservation biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available