4.6 Article

Avoiding Data Corruption in Drop Computing Mobile Networks

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages 31170-31185

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2903018

Keywords

Mobile; cloud; edge; opportunistic; consistency

Funding

  1. project vINCI: Clinically-validated INtegrated Support for Assistive Care and Lifestyle Improvement: the Human Link [AAL2017-63-vINCI]
  2. project RO-SmartAgeing: Non-invasive monitoring and health assessment of the elderly in a smart environment [PN 19 37 03 01, CPN 301 100/2019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drop computing is a network paradigm that aims to address the issues of the mobile cloud computing model, which has started to show limitations especially since the advent of the Internet of Things and the increase in the number of connected devices. In drop computing, nodes are able to offload data and computations to the cloud, to edge devices, or to the social-based opportunistic network composed of other nodes located nearby. In this paper, we focus on the lowest layer of drop computing, where mobile nodes offload tasks and data to and from each other through close-range protocols, based on their social connections. In such a scenario, where the data can circulate in the mobile network on multiple paths (and through multiple other devices), consistency issues may appear due to data corruption or malicious intent. Since there is no central entity that can control the way information is spread and its correctness, alternative methods need to be employed. In this paper, we propose several mechanisms for ensuring data consistency in drop computing, ranging from a rating system to careful analysis of the data received. Through thorough experimentation, we show that our proposed solution is able to maximize the amount of correct (i.e., uncorrupted) data exchanged in the network, with percentages as high as 100%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available