4.3 Review

A systematic review of sport for development interventions across six global cities

Journal

SPORT MANAGEMENT REVIEW
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 181-193

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2018.06.013

Keywords

Peace; Physical activity; Programme; Research; Global; Evidence

Funding

  1. Laureus Sport for Good Foundation
  2. Commonwealth Secretariat

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently published reviews have begun the process of synthesizing the knowledge within the growing Sport for Development (SfD) field, but there is a need to critically evaluate the research on which these findings are based. This systematic review is a critical appraisal of both quantitative and qualitative evidence in academic and grey literature in the SfD field. The strength and quality of the research is assessed to provide a more nuanced understanding of the reported evidence of SfD interventions in six global cities (Cape Town, Hong Kong, London, Mumbai, Nairobi, and New Orleans). The results include several key findings: (a) there is a limited number of academic and grey literature with enough methodological details for critical appraisal; (b) the quality of methods and evidence in individual studies is largely classified as weak; and (c) there is a need for more rigorous, systematic research and evaluation efforts that are openly shared and assessed. These findings provide a foundation from which to suggest 'next steps' for SfD organisations and researchers. (C) 2018 Sport Management Association of Australia and New Zealand. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available