4.6 Article

Structural impact of Zn-insertion into monoclinic V2(PO4)3: implications for Zn-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages 7159-7167

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta00716d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Division of Materials Research [1709081]
  2. Welch Foundation [F-1254]
  3. Division Of Materials Research
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1709081] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The zinc-ion battery (ZIB) has been a system of particular interest in the research community as a possible alternative to lithium-ion batteries (LIB), and much work has been devoted to finding a suitable host material. In this article, monoclinic V-2(PO4)(3) is investigated as a host material for reversible insertion of Zn2+. Initial chemical assessment via a facile microwave-assisted chemical insertion method indicates the possibility of Zn2+ insertion into the host. Electrochemical assessment, however, exhibits a significant capacity fade. In-depth analysis on the average and local structure of Li3V2(PO4)(3), the empty host V-2(PO4)(3), and the Zn-inserted V-2(PO4)(3) reveals that heavy distortion is induced upon Zn2+ insertion into the V-2(PO4)(3) framework, which is believed to be a result of a strong host-guest interaction jeopardizing the structural integrity. This is further supported by the dissolution of most of the material during the chemical oxidation of the Zn-inserted V-2(PO4)(3). The underlying structural inadequacy poses difficulties for monoclinic V-2(PO4)(3) to be a viable reversible host for Zn-ion batteries. This work suggests that not only the electrostatic repulsions of multivalent ions in a structure during diffusion, but also the structural stability of the host upon insertion of multivalent ions, must be considered for a better design of suitable host materials for multivalent-ion batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available