4.7 Article

What makes the sharing economy successful? An empirical examination of competitive customer value propositions

Journal

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR
Volume 95, Issue -, Pages 275-283

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.019

Keywords

Sharing economy; Customer value proposition (CVP); Economic value; Social value; Emotional value; Technical value; Customer repurchase intention

Funding

  1. Study on Beijing Sharing Accommodation Industry Development Strategy and Policy, Beijing philosophy and social science planning Program Grant [16JDGLA001]
  2. Beijing high level innovation and entrepreneurial talent support program leading personnel project foundation [G03040012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current study aims to identify a customer value proposition (CVP) for the sharing economy business model and to compare the competitive advantages of CVPs in the sharing economy. Because of the novelty of the topic of CVPs in the context of the sharing economy, this study adopts a mixed-methods approach. First, a qualitative study is conducted to develop a scale and theoretical framework for a CVP in the sharing economy. Then, a quantitative approach is performed to test the scale and framework and compare CVPs and their competitive advantages. The qualitative study shows that four values reside in a CVP: economic, social, emotional, and technical. These values result in the development of a model CVP for the sharing economy. Moreover, the quantitative data collected from 1285 samples indicate that social and emotional values are assessed as more significant than technical and economic values in terms of customer repurchase intention with regard to services in the sharing economy. Furthermore, results show that social and emotional values play equal roles in motivating customers to revisit businesses in the sharing economy. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available