4.6 Article

Characterization and comparison of capillary pore structures of digital cement pastes

Journal

MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-017-1023-9

Keywords

Cement paste; Capillary pore; Pore size distribution; Unsaturated; Connectivity; Tortuosity

Funding

  1. Dutch Technology Foundation [10981]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

More and more studies are based on digital microstructures of cement pastes obtained either by numerical modelling or by experiments. A comprehensive understanding of the their pore structures, therefore, becomes significant. In this study, the pore structure of a virtual cement paste (HYMO-1d) generated by cement hydration model HYMOSTRUC 3D is characterized. The pore structure of HYMO-1d is compared to the one of CT-1d that is reconstructed by using X-ray computed tomography technique (CT scan). Both HYMO-1d and CT-1d have the same porosity. Various parameters are taken into account, viz., the specific surface area, the pore size distribution (PSD), the connectivity and the tortuosity of waterfilled pores. Regarding the PSD, two concepts (i.e., the continuous PSD'' and the PSD by MIP simulation'') are adopted. The continuous PSD'' is believed to be a realistic'' PSD; while the PSD by MIP simulation'' is affected by the throat'' and ink bottle'' pores. The results show that HYMO-1d and CT-1d exhibit a similar curve of continuous PSD'', but distinct curves of PSD by MIP simulation'' and different specific surface areas. A lower complexity of the pore structure of HYMO-1d is indicated by a higher tortuosity of water-filled pores with reference to CT-1d. This study indicates that the comparison of pore structures between the digital microstructures should be based on multiple parameters. It also gives an insight into further studies on digital microstructures, i.e. transport properties of unsaturated materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available