4.7 Article

Soil nitrogen determines greenhouse gas emissions from northern peatlands under concurrent warming and vegetation shifting

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0370-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation-Leaders Opportunity Fund (CFI-LOF)
  3. Ignite RD
  4. Leverage RD
  5. Regional Collaboration Research Initiative (RCRI) of Research & Development Corporation, NL
  6. Seed Bridge Fund of Memorial University
  7. Agricultural Research Initiative of NL
  8. Humber River Basin Research Initiative of NL
  9. Grenfell Campus' Start-up Research Fund
  10. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31670450]
  11. Fundamental Research Funds for ICBR [1632018004]
  12. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC0507301, 2018YFD060010402]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Boreal peatlands store an enormous pool of soil carbon that is dependent upon - and vulnerable to changes in - climate, as well as plant community composition. However, how nutrient availability affects the effects of climate and vegetation change on ecosystem processes in these nutrient-poor ecosystems remains unclear. Here we show that although warming promoted higher CH4 emissions, the concurrent addition of N counteracted most (79%) of this effect. The regulation effects of the vegetation functional group, associated with the substrate quality, suggest that CH4 emissions from peatlands under future warming will be less than expected with predicted shrub expansion. In contrast, N2O flux will be enhanced under future warming with predicted shrub expansion. Our study suggests that changes in greenhouse gas emissions in response to future warming and shifts in plant community composition depend on N availability, which reveals the complex interactions that occur when N is not a limiting nutrient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available