4.7 Article

Spatial-temporal distribution and risk assessment of mercury in different fractions in surface sediments from the Yangtze River estuary

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages 488-495

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.07.034

Keywords

Fractions of mercury; Sediment; Spatial distribution; Risk assessment; Yangtze River estuary

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41571486]
  2. Ministry of Education and Social Science Fund [14YJAZH048]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Project) [2010CB429003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The temporal and spatial distributions of mercury in different fractions and its potential ecological risk were investigated in sediments from the Yangtze River estuary (YRE) by analyzing data collected from, the study area. The results showed that mercury in the organic and residual fractions had dominant proportions, from 15.2% to 48,52% and from 45.96% to 81.59%, respectively. The fractions were more susceptible to seasonal changes than other fractions. Higher proportions of mercury in organic fraction were found in wet seasons; the opposite was true for mercury in residual fraction. With respect to the spatial distribution, the concentration mercury in exchangeable, carbonate and Fe-Mn oxide fractions showed a decreasing trend from the inner estuary to the outer estuary, but no obvious trends were found in the distributions of mercury in the organic and residual fractions. The risk assessment code (RAC) was used to evaluate the potential ecological risk in the study area based on the proportions of exchangeable and carbonate fractions. The average RAC values during the four periods were 6.00%, 2.20%, 2.83%, and 0.61%. Although these values show that the risk in the study area is generally low, the distribution of RAC values indicates that the inner estuary has a medium risk, with a value up to 10%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available