4.7 Article

Benthic foraminifera as bio-indicators of chemical and physical stressors in Hammerfest harbor (Northern Norway)

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages 384-396

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.09.053

Keywords

Benthic foraminifera; Heavy metals; Persistent organic pollutants; Harbor environment; Bio-monitoring; Ecological quality status

Funding

  1. Northern Environmental Waste Management (EWMA) project
  2. Research Council of Norway through NORDSATSING [195160]
  3. EniNorge AS
  4. University of Tromso
  5. Barents Sea drill cuttings initiative (BARCUT) project - EniNorge

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated benthic foraminiferal assemblages in contaminated sediments in a subarctic harbor of Northern Norway to assess their utility as indicators of anthropogenic impacts. Sediments in the harbor are repositories for POPs and heavy metals supplied through discharges from industry and shipping activities. Sediment contaminant concentrations are at moderate to poor ecological quality status (EcoQS) levels. The EcoQS based on benthic foraminiferal diversity reflects a similar trend to the EcoQS based on contaminant concentrations. Foraminiferal density and diversity is low throughout the harbor with distinct assemblages reflecting influence of physical disturbances or chemical stressors. Assemblages impacted by physical disturbance are dominated by L. lobatula and E. excavatum, while assemblages impacted by chemical stressors are dominated by opportunistic species S. fusiformis, S. biformis, B. spathulata and E. excavatum. The foraminiferal assemblage from an un-impacted nearby fjord consists mainly of agglutinated taxa These assemblages provides a valuable baseline of the ecological impacts of industrialization in northern coastal communities. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available