4.3 Article

Openness and front end of innovation: does customer type matter?

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 536-549

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JBIM-06-2017-0134

Keywords

Openness; Customer integration; Business customers; Cross-industry networks; Front-end of innovation; Private customers; Idea creativity; Product definition

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose This paper aims to study the moderating effect of customer type (business customers versus private customers) on the link between two forms of openness (cross-industry networks and customer integration) and two front-end innovation outcomes (a creative idea and a product definition), in the context of radical innovations. Design/methodology/approach An agreement was established with the Statistical Office of the Basque Government. This agreement enabled us to access a reliable list of innovative companies in the region that constituted our sample frame. Questionnaires were collected by phone. The response rate was 41.6%, which led to a sample size of 189 firms. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. Findings The study reveals that idea creativity is explained by different external drivers in business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-customer (B2C) settings. In B2B settings, customer integration is found to have no effect on idea creativity. For product definition, however, both the external drivers, namely, cross-industry networks and customer integration, matter, although the latter is more salient. Practical implications - In the search for creative ideas, managers of firms that serve business customers should focus on cross-industry networks, while those that serve private customers should concentrate on customer integration. Originality/value Most previous quantitative studies on the front end have focused on internal drivers, and some of them use a mix of B2B and B2C data, which could lead to misleading conclusions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available