4.7 Article

Large microplastic particles in sediments of tributaries of the River Thames, UK - Abundance, sources and methods for effective quantification

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages 218-226

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.09.004

Keywords

Microplastics; Freshwater; Sediment; Sources; Pollution; Raman

Funding

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council through Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Pollution and Environmental Risk Program
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh020007] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [ceh020007] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sewage effluent input and population were chosen as predictors of microplastic presence in sediments at four sites in the River Thames basin (UK). Large microplastic particles (1 mm-4 mm) were extracted using a stepwise approach to include visual extraction, flotation and identification using Raman spectroscopy. Microplastics were found at all four sites. One site had significantly higher numbers of microplastics than other sites, average 66 particles 100 g(-1), 91% of which were fragments. This site was downstream of a storm drain outfall receiving urban runoff; many of the fragments at this site were determined to be derived of thermoplastic road-surface marking paints. At the remaining three sites, fibres were the dominant particle type. The most common polymers identified included polypropylene, polyester and polyarylsulphone. This study describes two major new findings: presence of microplastic particles in a UK freshwater system and identification of road marking paints as a source of microplastics. Capsule: This study is the first to quantify microplastics of any size in river sediments in the UK and links their presence to terrestrial sources including sewage and road marking paints. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available