4.7 Article

Effects of sediment contamination on physiological and biochemical responses of the polychaete Diopatra neapolitana, an exploited natural resource

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 119, Issue 1, Pages 119-131

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.03.014

Keywords

Polychaetes; Metals and as; Sediment contamination; Ria de Aveiro; Biomarkers; Regeneration

Funding

  1. Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT) [CESAM: UID/AMB/50017/2013]
  2. National Funds through the Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT)
  3. FSE
  4. Programa Operacional Capital Humano (POCH) e da Uniao Europeia
  5. [SFRH/BPD/107739/2015]
  6. [SFRH/BPD/92258/2013]
  7. [SFRH/BD/86356/2012]
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/86356/2012] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study reports metal and arsenic contamination in sediments, as well as element accumulation and partitioning in the polychaete Diopatra neapolitana in the Ria de Aveiro lagoon (Portugal). The polychaetes biochemical performance and tissue regenerative capacity were also evaluated. The concentration of elements in sediments showed an increase of contamination among areas (areas A-G), but higher bioaccumulation was observed in organisms from a less contaminated area (area C, BAF > 1). This study evidenced that individuals with higher elements bioaccumulation presented higher LPO and lower GSH/GSSG and also exhibited lower capacity for body regeneration. Polychaetes biotransformation capacity as well as antioxidant defense mechanisms were not sufficiently efficient to withstand the excess of ROS leading to increased LPO when organisms presented higher bioaccumulation levels. Additionally, an increase of methalotionines was also observed in individuals with higher bioaccumulation of metals and As, suggesting an induction of detoxification processes. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available