3.8 Article

Environmental Sustainability of Pasta Production Chains: An Integrated Approach for Comparing Local and Global Chains

Journal

RESOURCES-BASEL
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/resources8010056

Keywords

durum wheat environmental sustainability; ancient grains; pasta production; environmental impacts analysis; Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Major pasta industries have started to evaluate the environmental footprint of their productions exploiting both Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and, in some cases, Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) methodologies. In this research, two different pasta production chains were considered: a high-quality pasta chain (referred here as local or regional scenario), which follows traditional procedures in a Tuscan farm that uses only ancient wheat varieties; and a conventional pasta one (referred here as global or industrial scenario), in which pasta is produced using national and international grains, following industrial processes. An integrated methodology based on both an Environmental Impacts ANalysis (EIAN) approach and the LCA has been developed, analyzing five environmental compartments (i.e., soil, water, air, resources, climate change) and a total number of ten expected environmental pressures. As a result, the high-quality pasta chain shows a better performance in terms of risk reduction of soil degradation and agrobiodiversity loss, as well as the consumption of non-renewable resources; this is mainly due to the use of lower quantity of chemicals, a lower mechanization level in the agricultural phase, and the use of ancient grains. However, the conventional pasta chain prevails in terms of a more efficient exploitation of land and water resources, due to higher yields and the use of more efficient sprayers, and also in reducing noise emitted by the overall production equipment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available