4.6 Article

Carnegie Supernova Project-II: Using Near-infrared Spectroscopy to Determine the Location of the Outer 56Ni in Type Ia Supernovae

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 875, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1654

Keywords

supernovae: general

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-1821967, 1821987, 1813708, 1813466, AST-1008343, AST-1613426, AST-1613472, AST-1715133, AST-16113455]
  2. Sapere Aude Level II grant from the Danish National Research Foundation (DFF)
  3. VILLUM FONDEN [13261]
  4. Aarhus University Research Fund (AUFF)
  5. NASA [NNX16AB25G]
  6. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy
  7. Gemini Observatory [GS-2015A-Q-5]
  8. University of Hawaii [NNH14CK55B]
  9. NASA [NNX16AB25G, 907926] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the H-band wavelength region of 37 postmaximum light near-infrared spectra of three normal, nine transitional, and four subluminous type. Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), extending from +5. days to +20. days relative to the epoch of B-band maximum. We introduce a new observable, the blue-edge velocity, v(edge), of the prominent Fe/Co/Ni-peak H-band emission feature, which is quantitatively measured. The v(edge) parameter is found to decrease over subtype ranging from around -14,000 km s(-1) for normal SNe Ia, to -10,000 km s(-1) for transitional SNe. Ia, down to -5000 km s(-1) for the subluminous SNe. Ia. Furthermore, inspection of the +10 +/- 3 days spectra indicates that v(edge) is correlated with the color-stretch parameter, s(BV), and hence with peak luminosity. These results follow the previous findings that brighter SNe. Ia tend to have Ni-56 located at higher velocities as compared to subluminous objects. As v(edge) is a model-independent parameter, we propose it can be used in combination with traditional observational diagnostics to provide a new avenue to robustly distinguish between leading SNe. Ia explosion models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available