3.8 Article

Wavelet-Exponential Smoothing: a New Hybrid Method for Suspended Sediment Load Modeling

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40710-019-00363-0

Keywords

Suspended sediment load; Artificial neural network; Seasonality models; Exponential smoothing methods; Wavelet transform; Time series decomposition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, four conventional and a newly proposed method of wavelet-exponential smoothing (WES) - with two presented scenarios (WES1 and WES2) - are employed to estimate daily and monthly suspended sediment load (SSL) in two rivers (Lighvanchai river in Iran and Upper Rio Grande in the USA), which have different hydro-geomorphological characteristics of the related watersheds. In the proposed WES method, first, wavelet transform (WT) is applied to the original observed time series to decompose them into approximation and detailed subseries to separate different components of time series. For the first scenario (WES1), only two time series, i.e., an approximation and a detail time series are utilized as inputs of model, whereas for the second scenario (WES2), all subseries are separately fed into different exponential smoothing (ES) models. The results revealed that for both rivers, the proposed WES2 and wavelet based artificial neural network (WANN) models could lead to superior performance in comparison to the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), seasonal ARIMA (SARIMA), ES ad-hoc and artificial neural network (ANN). The WES2 method could enhance the overall performance of SSL forecasting both in daily and monthly modeling of the case studies regarding Nash-Sutcliffe (E) efficiency criteria, respectively up to 13%, 42% and 87%, 116% in daily and monthly scales for SSL modeling of the Lighvanchai and Upper Rio Grande Rivers. As a result, combining WT with ES method and ANN led to more accurate modeling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available