4.3 Article

Circulating Iron Levels Interaction with Central Obesity on the Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Case-Control Study in Southeast China

Journal

ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 207-214

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000497228

Keywords

Iron; Ferritins; Hepcidin; Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81473047]
  2. Joint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology, Fujian Province [2017Y9104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the associations between body iron stores and the risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in a Chinese population and explore whether this effect may be modified by other factors. Methods: A 1: 1 frequency-matched case-control study was conducted, including 482 NAFLD cases and 490 gender-and age-matched controls. Serum levels of ferritin, hepcidin, and C-reactive protein were measured. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that hepcidin was not associated with NAFLD risk; however, elevated serum ferritin was significantly associated with increased risk of NAFLD (adjusted OR 1.619, 95% CI 1.158-2.267), and hepcidin: ferritin ratio was significantly associated with decreased risk of NAFLD -(ORadjusted 0.702, 95% CI 0.501-0.984). When stratified by gender, a significant association was found between elevated serum ferritin and hepcidin: ferritin ratio and NAFLD only for women (ORadjusted 2.131, 95% CI 1.151-3.944 and ORadjusted 0.414, 95% CI 0.219-0.781, respectively). A significant multiplicative interaction between central obesity and elevated serum hepcidin was observed (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Elevated serum ferritin and hepcidin: ferritin ratio are associated with NAFLD in a Chinese population. Although serum hepcidin is not associated with NAFLD, it may augment the risk effect of central obesity on NAFLD. (c) 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available