4.6 Article

Photocatalytic reforming of sugar and glucose into H2 over functionalized graphene dots

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 7, Issue 14, Pages 8384-8393

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta12123k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan [107-2221-E-006-110-MY3, 107-2221-E-006-111-MY3, 107-2622-8-006-015, 107-3113-E-006-006, MOST 107-3017-E-006-003]
  2. Ministry of Education (MOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Photocatalytic reforming of biomass into H-2 combined with its counterpart, photosynthesis, constitutes a sustainable carbon cycle that produces a clean solar fuel. This study reports the use of environmentally benign graphene-based photocatalysts to effectively reform sugar and glucose. We produce a catalyst consisting of sulfur and nitrogen codoped graphene oxide dots (SNGODs) by sequentially annealing graphite-derived graphene oxide with sulfur and ammonia, exfoliating the annealed product into dots, and autoclaving the dots in an ammonia solution. The codoping introduces quaternary nitrogen into the graphene basal plane to patch the vacancy defects and autoclaving creates a conjugation between nitrogen nonbonding states and the graphitic- orbital by introducing peripheral amide and amino groups. These functionalization steps enlarge the electron resonance domain, narrowing the bandgap and inducing charge delocalization and separation. Here, SNGODs deposited with a Pt cocatalyst effectively catalyzed H-2 production from aqueous solutions of sugar and glucose under visible light irradiation for more than 80 h. The apparent quantum yields of reforming of sugar and glucose reach 11% and 7.4%, respectively, under 420 nm monochromatic irradiation. This pioneer study demonstrates the superiority of using carbon-based photocatalysts for biomass reforming and provides a structure-tuning strategy for enhancing the catalytic activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available