4.7 Article

The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3-Part 1: Aerosol evaluation

Journal

GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 1643-1677

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Climate System Modelling (C2SM) at ETH Zurich
  2. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) project BACCHUS [603445]
  3. Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS) [s652]
  4. DKRZ [bb1004]
  5. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) project BAC-CHUS [603445]
  6. European Research Council project ACCLAIM [FP7280025]
  7. European Research Council project RECAP under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [724602]
  8. Academy of Finland [308292, 307331]
  9. Nordforsk [57001]
  10. NOAA [NA17RJ1231]
  11. National Science Foundation [ATM-0002035, ATM-0002698, ATM04-01611]
  12. NERC Global Aerosol Synthesis and Science Project (GASSP) [NE/J023515/1]
  13. US Environmental Protection Agency
  14. National Park Service
  15. James S. McDonnell Foundation Award for 21st Century Science
  16. Academy of Finland (AKA) [308292, 308292] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
  17. NERC [NE/L01355X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce and evaluate aerosol simulations with the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3, which is the aerosol component of the fully coupled aerosol-chemistry-climate model ECHAM-HAMMOZ. Both the host atmospheric climate model ECHAM6.3 and the aerosol model HAM2.3 were updated from previous versions. The updated version of the HAM aerosol model contains improved parameterizations of aerosol processes such as cloud activation, as well as updated emission fields for anthropogenic aerosol species and modifications in the online computation of sea salt and mineral dust aerosol emissions. Aerosol results from nudged and free-running simulations for the 10-year period 2003 to 2012 are compared to various measurements of aerosol properties. While there are regional deviations between the model and observations, the model performs well overall in terms of aerosol optical thickness, but may underestimate coarse-mode aerosol concentrations to some extent so that the modeled particles are smaller than indicated by the observations. Sulfate aerosol measurements in the US and Europe are reproduced well by the model, while carbonaceous aerosol species are biased low. Both mineral dust and sea salt aerosol concentrations are improved compared to previous versions of ECHAM-HAM. The evaluation of the simulated aerosol distributions serves as a basis for the suitability of the model for simulating aerosol-climate interactions in a changing climate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available