4.5 Review

Haemodynamic Instability and Brain Injury in Neonates Exposed to Hypoxia-Ischaemia

Journal

BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci9030049

Keywords

hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy; asphyxia; neonate; cord clamping; oxygen; haemodynamic

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Government Research Training Programme (RTP) Scholarship
  2. National Heart Foundation of Australia
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Fellowships [1105526]
  4. NHMRC Fellowships [545921, 1136216, APP1165935]
  5. Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Programme
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1136216] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brain injury in the asphyxic newborn infant may be exacerbated by delayed restoration of cardiac output and oxygen delivery. With increasing severity of asphyxia, cerebral autoregulatory responses are compromised. Further brain injury may occur in association with high arterial pressures and cerebral blood flows following the restoration of cardiac output. Initial resuscitation aims to rapidly restore cardiac output and oxygenation whilst mitigating the impact of impaired cerebral autoregulation. Recent animal studies have indicated that the current standard practice of immediate umbilical cord clamping prior to resuscitation may exacerbate injury. Resuscitation prior to umbilical cord clamping confers several haemodynamic advantages. In particular, it retains the low-resistance placental circuit that mitigates the rebound hypertension and cerebrovascular injury. Prolonged cerebral hypoxia-ischaemia is likely to contribute to further perinatal brain injury, while, at the same time, tissue hyperoxia is associated with oxidative stress. Efforts to monitor and target cerebral flow and oxygen kinetics, for example, using near-infrared spectroscopy, are currently being evaluated and may facilitate development of novel resuscitation approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available