4.7 Article

Plasmonic Interference Lithography for Low-Cost Fabrication of Dense Lines with Sub-50 nm Half-Pitch

Journal

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 489-496

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.8b02047

Keywords

interference lithography; surface plasmonic; optical waveguide; near-field; diffraction limit; super resolution; nanomanufacturing; subwavelength optics

Funding

  1. National Basic Research (973) Program of China [2013CBA01700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61805252, 61575203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Limited by the cost and complexity, a sub-SO nm lithography node is hard to achieve through the traditional interference lithography. In this paper, the dense lines with half-pitch of 32 nm (similar to lambda/11) and 22 nm (similar to lambda/16) are first achieved at the wavelength of 365 nm by simple plasmonic interference lithography. Through selecting the high spatial frequency plasmonic modes in Al/Photoresist (Pr)/Al waveguide and allowing interference with each other, the deep subwavelength plasmonic interference field could be obtained in Pr film. Moreover, the lithography structure is separated from the mask, so etch transfer process from Pr to substrate after lithography is easy to attain, and the mask with high cost could be used multiple times. Meanwhile, a near-field lithography setup was developed, and we experimentally realized the comparatively distinct lithography fringes with the half-pitch of 32 and 22 nm when there is an air gap smaller than similar to 20 nm between mask and the lithography films. Compared with the imaging lithography with 1:1 ratio, the plasmonic interference lithography could achieve the demagnified patterns with a 2:1 ratio, which reduces the difficulty and cost of the mask fabrication. It is believed that this method will supply the simple and low-cost nanofabrication scenario in the near future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available