4.7 Article

A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change

Journal

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages 791-817

Publisher

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2366

Keywords

networks; graphs; research and development; innovation; technological change; organizational studies; strategy; universities

Funding

  1. Rackham Graduate School at the University of Michigan
  2. Interdisciplinary Committee on Organizational Studies at the University of Michigan
  3. National Science Foundation [SES-0545634, SMA-1158711, SMA-1262447]
  4. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation
  5. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  6. SBE Off Of Multidisciplinary Activities
  7. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1262447] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article outlines a network approach to the study of technological change. We propose that new inventions reshape networks of interlinked technologies by shifting inventors' attention to or away from the knowledge on which those inventions build. Using this approach, we develop novel indexes of the extent to which a new invention consolidates or destabilizes existing technology streams. We apply these indexes in analyses of university research commercialization and find that, although federal research funding pushes campuses to create inventions that are more destabilizing, deeper commercial ties lead them to produce technologies that consolidate the status quo. By quantifying the effects that new technologies have on their predecessors, the indexes we propose allow patent-based studies of innovation to capture conceptually important phenomena that are not detectable with established measures. The measurement approach presented here offers empirical insights that support theoretical development in studies of innovation, entrepreneurship, technology strategy, science policy, and social network theory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available