4.4 Article

Reduced ex vivo susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum after oral artemether-lumefantrine treatment in Mali

Journal

MALARIA JOURNAL
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1700-8

Keywords

Artemether; Lumefantrine; Plasmodium; Ex vivo; In vivo; K13 propeller

Funding

  1. European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP) [IP_07_31060_002]
  2. West African Network for Clinical Trials of Antimalarial Drugs (WANECAM)
  3. Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV)
  4. Wellcome Trust through Institute of Infectious Diseases of Poverty (IIDP) [087536/Z/08/Z]
  5. Wellcome Trust [087536/Z/08/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Artemisinin-based combination therapy is the recommended first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria worldwide. However, recent studies conducted in Mali showed an increased frequency of recurrent parasitaemia following artemether-lumefantrine (AL) treatment. Methods: Study samples were collected during a large WANECAM study. Ex-vivo Plasmodium falciparum sensitivity to artemether and lumefantrine was assessed using the tritiated hypoxanthine-based assay. The prevalence of molecular markers of anti-malarial drug resistance (pfcrt K76T, pfmdr1 N86Y and K13-propeller) were measured by PCR and/or sequencing. Results: Overall 61 samples were successfully analysed in ex vivo studies. Mean IC(50)s increased significantly between baseline and recurrent parasites for both artemether (1.6 nM vs 3.2 nM, p < 0.001) and lumefantrine (1.4 nM vs 3.4 nM, p = 0.004). Wild type Pfmdr1 N86 allele was selected after treatment (71 vs 91%, 112 of 158 vs 95 of 105, p < 0.001) but not the wild type pfcrt K76 variant (23.5 vs 24.8%, 40 of 170 vs 26 of 105, p = 0.9). Three non-synonymous K13-propeller SNPs (A522C, A578S, and G638R) were found with allele frequencies < 2%. Conclusion: Malian post-AL P. falciparum isolates were less susceptible to artemether and lumefantrine than baseline isolates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available