4.5 Article

Acceleration of ASL-based time-resolved MR angiography by acquisition of control and labeled images in the same shot (ACTRESS)

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages 224-233

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26667

Keywords

Time-resolved MR angiography (MRA); noncontrast 4D-MRA; arterial spin labeling (ASL); hyperbolic secant (HS) pulse; FOCI pulse

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeNoncontrast 4D-MR-angiography (MRA) using arterial spin labeling (ASL) is beneficial because high spatial and temporal resolution can be achieved. However, ASL requires acquisition of labeled and control images for each phase. The purpose of this study is to present a new accelerated 4D-MRA approach that requires only a single control acquisition, achieving similar image quality in approximately half the scan time. MethodsIn a multi-phase Look-Locker sequence, the first phase was used as the control image and the labeling pulse was applied before the second phase. By acquiring the control and labeled images within a single Look-Locker cycle, 4D-MRA was generated in nearly half the scan time of conventional ASL. However, this approach potentially could be more sensitive to off-resonance and magnetization transfer (MT) effects. To counter this, careful optimizations of the labeling pulse were performed by Bloch simulations. In in-vivo studies arterial visualization was compared between the new and conventional ASL approaches. ResultsOptimization of the labeling pulse successfully minimized off-resonance effects. Qualitative assessment showed that residual MT effects did not degrade visualization of the peripheral arteries. ConclusionThis study demonstrated that the proposed approach achieved similar image quality as conventional ASL-MRA approaches in just over half the scan time. Magn Reson Med 79:224-233, 2018. (c) 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available