4.7 Article

Vulnerability of ecosystem services provisioning to urbanization: A case of China

Journal

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Volume 57, Issue -, Pages 505-513

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.025

Keywords

Vulnerability assessment; Ecosystem services; Urbanization; Composite index

Funding

  1. Key Project of jinzhong Culture Ecological Research Center [JZXY2014105]
  2. Key Project of Shanxi Federation of Social Science [SSKLZDKT2014120]
  3. Key Research Base Project of Human Social Science of Shanxi Province Universities [2015336]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41401631]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vulnerability assessment has gradually emerged as a basic tool in analyzing the response of regional and global environment to external events. Many studies have evidenced the increasing urbanization pressures on ecosystems and the threat to their potential for the provision of services. However, rather few efforts have been spared to characterize the vulnerability of ecosystem services provisioning to urbanization. This paper presents an integrated index to determine the vulnerability of ecosystem services provisioning to urbanization in China. It was based on the Exposure-Sensitivity-Capacity framework and integrated 16 indicators of ecological and socioeconomic dimensions. Quantitative analysis verified the effectiveness of the integrated index, and spatiotemporal patterns of vulnerability were obtained. Horizontal comparisons demonstrated that vulnerability was higher in the eastern provinces. The western and central provinces were roughly the same vulnerability level; however, the profiles of vulnerability for these regions were substantially different, particularly in sensitivity and capacity, respectively. The longitudinal comparisons highlighted the vulnerability degree of the eastern and central provinces was intensified between 1979 and 2010. The developed index could be further applicable to other locations and facilitate environmental management. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available