4.5 Article

Compressed sensing in quantitative determination of GAG concentration in cartilage by microscopic MRI

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 79, Issue 6, Pages 3163-3171

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26973

Keywords

compressed sensing; MRI; cartilage; anisotropy; GAG; T-1

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AR052353, R01 AR069047]
  2. NIH [P41 EB015897]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR069047, R01AR052353] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [P41EB015897] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo evaluate the potentials of compressed sensing (CS) in MRI quantification of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) concentration in articular cartilage at microscopic resolution. MethodsT(1)-weighted 2D experiments of cartilage were fully sampled in k-space with five inversion times at 17.6m resolution. These fully sampled k-space data were re-processed, by undersampling at various 1D and 2D CS undersampling factors (UFs). The undersampled data were reconstructed individually into 2D images using nonlinear reconstruction, which were used to calculate 2D maps of T-1 and GAG concentration. The values of T-1 and GAG in cartilage were evaluated at different UFs (up to 16, which used 6.25% of the data). K-space sampling pattern and zonal variations were also investigated. ResultsUsing 2D variable density sampling pattern, the T-1 images at UFs up to eight preserved major visual information and produced negligible artifacts. The GAG concentration remained accurate for different sub-tissue zones at various UFs. The variation of the mean GAG concentration through the whole tissue depth was 1.20%, compared to the fully sampled results. The maximum variation was 2.24% in the deep zone of cartilage. Using 1D variable density sampling pattern, the quantitative T-1 mapping and GAG concentration at UFs up to 4 showed negligible variations. ConclusionThis study demonstrates that CS could be beneficial in microscopic MRI (mu MRI) studies of cartilage by acquiring less data, without losing significant accuracy in the quantification of GAG concentration. Magn Reson Med 79:3163-3171, 2018. (c) 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available