4.5 Article

Amide proton transfer CEST of the cervical spinal cord in multiple sclerosis patients at 3T

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 79, Issue 2, Pages 806-814

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26736

Keywords

amide proton transfer; CEST; multiple sclerosis; spinal cord; normal-appearing white matter

Funding

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society [NMSS RG-1501-02840]
  2. NIH/NINDS [R21 NS087465-01]
  3. NIH/NEI [R01 EY023240]
  4. DoD [W81XWH-13-0073]
  5. NIH/NIBIB [K99/R00 EB016689]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeThe ability to evaluate pathological changes in the spinal cord in multiple sclerosis (MS) is limited because T-1- and T-2-w MRI imaging are not sensitive to biochemical changes in vivo. Amide proton transfer (APT) chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) can indirectly detect amide protons associated with proteins and peptides, potentially providing more pathological specificity. Here, we implement APT CEST in the cervical spinal cord of healthy and MS cohorts at 3T. MethodsAPT CEST of the cervical spinal cord was obtained in a cohort of 10 controls and 10 MS patients using a novel respiratory correction methodology. APT was quantified using two methods: 1) APT(w), based off the conventional magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry, and 2) APT, a spatial characterization of APT changes in MS patients relative to the controls. ResultsRespiratory correction yielded highly reproducible z-spectra in white matter (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.82). APT(w) signals in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) of MS patients were significantly different from healthy controls (P= 0.04), whereas APT of MS patients highlighted large APT differences in NAWM. ConclusionRespiration correction in the spinal cord is necessary to accurately quantify APT CEST, which can provide unique biochemical information regarding disease processes within the spinal cord. Magn Reson Med 79:806-814, 2018. (c) 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available