4.7 Article

Mechanically Robust Anion Exchange Membranes via Long Hydrophilic Cross-Linkers

Journal

MACROMOLECULES
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages 2329-2337

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b01381

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF DMREF program [CHE-1534326]
  2. Corning Foundation
  3. Pennsylvania State University Materials Research Institute
  4. Penn State Institutes of Energy & the Environment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mechanically tough, cross-linked anion exchange membranes (AEM) based on poly(2,6-dimethylphenylene oxide) (PPO) were achieved by introducing a hydrophilic and flexible Jeffamine (0,01-bis(2-aminopropyl)-polypropylene glycol-block-poly(ethylene glycol) -block -polypropylene glycol 500) cross -linker into the cationic macromolecular network. The Jeffamine cross-linked AEMs demonstrated outstanding strength and flexibility and were mechanically tougher than AEM samples based on benzyltrimethylammonium (BTMA) functionalized PPO alone. The hydrated BTMA40 membrane showed 52% elongation at break, while the Jeffamine-based J1OPPO sample had a 167% elongation at break. In addition, the hydroxide (OH-) conductivity of the J1OPPO sample was 52 mS/cm at 80 degrees C with a swelling ratio of 61%, while BTMA60 suffered severe swelling above 60 degrees C. The alkaline stabilities of the AEMs with different degrees of Jeffamine cross-linking were evaluated in 1 M NaOH at 80 degrees C for 500 h. During the 500 h degradation test, J1OPPO exhibited the greatest cation stability. The OH conductivity of this membrane decreased by 30% over 500 h. In contrast, the OH-conductivity of BTMA40 decreased to 9.6 mS/cm at 20 degrees C, which is 60% lower than the value measured for the sample before the stability test. Based on the highper formance Jeffamine cross-linked AEM, a Pt-catalyzed fuel cell with a peak power density of 314 mW/cm(2) was demonstrated at 60 C under 100% related humidity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available