4.7 Article

Lattice QCD study of the H dibaryon using hexaquark and two-baryon interpolators

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 99, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.074505

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. John von Neumann Institute for Computing [HMZ21]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 443, SFB 1044]
  3. Rhineland-Palatinate Research Initiative
  4. Department of Theoretical Physics (DTP), TIFR
  5. DFG [HA4470/3-1]
  6. Gauss Centre for Supercomputing e.V. [HMZ21]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a lattice QCD spectroscopy study in the isospin singlet, strangeness -2 sectors relevant for the conjectured H dibaryon. We employ both local and bilocal interpolating operators to isolate the ground state in the rest frame and in moving frames. Calculations are performed using two flavors of O(a)-improved Wilson fermions and a quenched strange quark. Our initial point-source method for constructing correlators does not allow for bilocal operators at the source; nevertheless, results from using these operators at the sink indicate that they provide an improved overlap onto the ground state in comparison with the local operators. We also present results, in the rest frame, using a second method based on distillation to compute a Hermitian matrix of correlators with bilocal operators at both the source and the sink. This method yields a much more precise and reliable determination of the ground-state energy. In the flavor-SU(3) symmetric case, we apply Luscher's finite-volume quantization condition to the rest-frame and moving-frame energy levels to determine the S-wave scattering phase shift, near and below the two-particle threshold. For a pion mass of 960 MeV, we find that there exists a bound H dibaryon with binding energy Delta E = (19 +/- 10) MeV. In the 27-plet (dineutron) sector, the finite-volume analysis suggests that the existence of a bound state is unlikely.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available