4.6 Review

A unified approach for investigating chemosensor properties - dynamic characteristics

Journal

ANALYST
Volume 144, Issue 7, Pages 2208-2225

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9an00268e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Novo Nordisk Fonden [4096]
  2. Carlsbergfonden
  3. Villum Fonden [14922]
  4. BIOPRO
  5. University of Copenhagen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemosensors are a group of sensorsresponsive sensor chemistry, sensor hardware, and softwarethat report on the composition of solutions and gaseous samples. Dynamic properties are fundamental for all sensor characterization. While electrochemical chemosensors have seen a century of research and are well-described, research on chemosensors using other modes of transductions are still at an early stage. The dynamic properties of chemosensorsindependent of their mode of transductionare not reported consistently in the literature. This makes it impossible to compare sensor performance of chemosensors from different manufacturers and laboratories. To remedy this, standardized experimental methods that exclude the influence of drift and any dependence on activity step change must be used. Subsequently, the resulting data must be treated using a unifying analysis formalism, and robust values must be used to describe chemosensor characteristics. Characterizing the sensor properties in turn enables rationalizing the link between sensor performance and sensor chemistry. Following a review of sensor theory, a thorough discussion of experimental methods and data analysis models for determining dynamic sensor properties, we arrive at evidence-based recommendations for good practice when describing new chemosensors. Adhering to these recommendations, sensor performance can be compared between laboratories, and information on the sensor chemistry may be revealed in the data analysis. This topic is particularly relevant in the rapidly maturing field of optical chemosensors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available