4.6 Article

Oxygen surface exchange properties and surface segregation behavior of nanostructured La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ thin film cathodes

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages 7183-7195

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9cp00606k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. New Energy and Industrial Development Organization (NEDO) project, Basic study on rapid evaluation method of SOFC durability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cathode materials with highly reactive surfaces and long-term stability are required to achieve high-performance solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs). In this study, a promising cathode material, La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-delta (LSCF), was prepared as a nanostructured thin film using pulsed laser deposition (PLD) on gadolinia-doped ceria (GDC)-buffered YSZ single crystal substrates having (100) and (111) orientations. Characterization revealed intrinsic differences among the as-grown LSCF thin films in terms of dominant crystalline orientation and nanostructure depending on GDC preparation as well as the YSZ substrate orientation. Evaluation of the oxygen exchange properties using the isotope exchange depth profile method revealed that LSCF thin films grown on (111) GDC/YSZ exhibited higher values of the apparent surface exchange coefficient compared to LSCF thin films grown on (100) GDC/YSZ. However, when subjected to long-term annealing at high temperatures, the former exhibited a stronger tendency to surface segregation as compared to the latter. These behaviors are correlated with the intrinsic properties of LSCF thin films, including the nanostructure, the possible effects attributed to SrO activity, and the stability of perovskite surfaces which would drive surface segregation. These results have implications for tailoring the performance of cathode thin films by understanding the dependence of oxygen exchange properties and surface segregation on driving forces such as surface chemistry and nanostructure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available