4.7 Article

Controlled Crosslinking Is a Tool To Precisely Modulate the Nanomechanical and Nanotribological Properties of Polymer Brushes

Journal

MACROMOLECULES
Volume 50, Issue 7, Pages 2932-2941

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b02409

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ETH Research Commission
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF Ambizione) [PZ00P2-148156]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P2_148156] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Covalent crosslinking of weak polyelectrolyte brushes widens the tuning potential for their swelling, nanomechanical, and nanotribological properties, which can be simultaneously adjusted by varying the crosslinker content and the pH of the surroundings. We demonstrate that this is especially valid for poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) brushes and brush hydrogels, and their ionizable, succinate-modified derivatives (PHEMA-SA), covalently crosslinked with different amounts of di(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate (DEGDMA) during surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) methods highlight how pristine PHEMA films are stiff and display high coefficients of friction in water. Their succinate derivatives swell profusely in aqueous, media. Under acidic conditions they are neutral, compliant, and lubricious, with apparent Young's moduli (E*) lying between 10 and 30 kPa. Their contact mechanical behavior can be described by either the Johnson-Kendall-Roberts (JKR) or the Derjaguin-Muller-Toporov (DMT) model, depending on crosslinker content. In contrast, under basic conditions, brushes and brush hydrogels become charged, expand, and present a rigid, electrostatic barrier toward the AFM probe. Friction is extremely low at relatively low applied loads, whereas it increases at higher loads, to an extent that is regulated by the number of crosslinks within the films.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available