4.7 Article

Stable isotope proxies for evaluating biodiversity in stream biota

Journal

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Volume 57, Issue -, Pages 228-235

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.030

Keywords

Aquatic invertebrate; Assemblage; Biodiversity; Charr; delta C-13 and delta N-15; Periphyron

Funding

  1. Global Environment Research Fund from the Ministry of the Environment, Japan [H-081]
  2. Japan Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sports [18580154]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18580154] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Differences in delta C-13 and delta N-15 values in stream biota are caused by several environmental conditions. Variations in abundance, species richness and the assemblage structure of stream biota are also caused by several environmental conditions. Hence, abundance, species richness and the assemblage structure of stream biota are expected to be strongly correlated with the differences in value of stable isotopes. In this study, the gaps in delta C-13 and delta N-15 between periphyton and charr are discussed in terms of the abundance, genus richness, and assemblage of benthic invertebrates at each site. Gaps in delta C-13 between periphyton and charr were strongly correlated with some aspects of mountainous area and the genus richness of benthic invertebrates at each site. The gaps in delta N-15 between periphyton and charr were strongly correlated with the abundance and assemblage structure of benthic invertebrates at the location tested. The delta C-13 values of predators were correlated with some aspects of mountainous area and the assemblage structure of the benthic invertebrates. The delta N-15 values of predators were correlated with genus richness and the assemblage structure of the benthic invertebrates. These results suggest that the value gaps in delta C-13 and delta N-15 can be used to assess biodiversity and could provide indices for estimating the biodiversity in a stream. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available