4.6 Article

A New Hybrid Algorithm for Retinal Vessels Segmentation on Fundus Images

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages 41885-41896

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906344

Keywords

CNN; fundus images; matched filter; modi fied Dolph-Chebyshev type I function; vessels segmentation

Funding

  1. Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation [B18041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Automatic retinal vessels segmentation is an important task in medical applications. However, most of the available retinal vessels segmentation methods are prone to poorer results when dealing with challenging situations such as detecting low-contrast micro-vessels, vessels with central re fiex, and vessels in the presence of pathologies. This paper presents a new hybrid algorithm for retinal vessels segmentation on fundus images. The proposed algorithm overcomes the difficulty when dealing with the challenging situations by first applying a new directionally sensitive blood vessel enhancement method before sending fundus images to a convolutional neural network architecture derived from U-Net. To train and test the algorithm, fundus images from the DRIVE and STARE databases, as well as high-resolution fundus images from the HRF database, are utilized. In the experiment, the proposed algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in four major measures, i.e., sensitivity, F1-score, G-mean, and Mathews correlation coefficient both on the low-and high-resolution images. In addition, the proposed algorithm achieves the best connectivity-area-length score among the competing methods. Given such performance, the proposed algorithm can be adapted for vessel-like structures segmentation in other medical applications. In addition, since the new blood vessel enhancement method is independent of the U-Net model, it can be easily applied to other deep learning architectures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available