4.3 Article

TIME-DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY TYPE SOIL MOISTURE SENSOR PERFORMANCE AND SOIL TEMPERATURE EFFECTS IN FINE- AND COARSE-TEXTURED SOILS

Journal

APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 117-134

Publisher

AMER SOC AGRICULTURAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.13031/aea.12908

Keywords

Capacitance; Frequency-domain reflectometry; Soil moisture; Time-domain reflectometry

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DBI-1331895]
  2. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Dr. Irmak's Hatch Project [NEB-21-155]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performances of six time-domain reflectometry (TDR) and frequency-domain reflectometry (FDR) type soil moisture sensors were investigated for measuring volumetric soil-water content (theta(nu)) in two different soil types. Soil-specific calibration equations were developed for each sensor using calibrated neutron probe-measured theta(nu.) Sensors were also investigated for their performance response in measuring theta(nu) to changes in soil temperature. The performance of all sensors was significantly different (P<0.05) than the neutron probe-measured theta(nu) with the same sensor also exhibiting variation between soils. In the silt loam soil, the 5TE sensor had the lowest root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.041 m(3)/m(3), indicating the best performance among all sensors investigated. The performance ranking of the other sensors from high performance to low was: TDR300 (High Clay Mode), CS616 (H) and 10HS, SA4150, TDR300 (Standard Mode), and CS616 (V) (H: horizontal installation and V: vertical installation). In the loamy sand, the CS616 (H) performed best with an RMSE of 0.014 m(3)/m(3) and the performance ranking of other sensors was: 5TE, CS616 (V), TDR300 (S), SA4150, and 10HS. When theta(nu) was near or above field capacity, the performance error of most sensors increased. Most sensors exhibited a linear response to increase in soil temperature. Most sensors exhibited substantial sensitivity to changes in soil temperature and the a response of the same sensor to high vs. normal soil temperatures differed significantly between the soils. All sensors underestimated theta(nu) in high temperature range in both soils. The ranking order of the magnitude of change in theta(nu) in response to 1 degrees C increase in soil temperature (from the lowest to the greatest impact of soil temperature on sensor performance) in silt loam soil was: SA4150, 5TE, TDR300 (S), 10HS, CS620, CS616 (H), and CS616 (V). The ranking order from lower to higher sensitivity to soil temperature changes in loamy sand was: 10HS, CS616 (H), 5TE, CS616 (V), SA4150, and TDR300 (S). When the data from all sensors and soils are pooled, the overall average of change in theta(nu) for a 1 degrees C increase in soil temperature was 0.21 m(3)/m(3) in silt loam soil and -0.052 m(3)/m(3) in loamy sand. When all TDR- and FDR-type sensors were pooled separately for both soils, the average change in theta(nu) for a 1 degrees C increase in soil temperature for the TDR- and FDR-type sensors was 0.1918 and -0.0273 m(3)/m(3), respectively, indicating that overall TDR-type sensors are more sensitive to soil temperature changes than FDR-type sensors when measuring theta(nu).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available