4.6 Article

BLTM: Beta and LQI Based Trust Model for Wireless Sensor Networks

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages 43679-43690

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905550

Keywords

Wireless sensor networks; beta distribution; link quality indicator; trust model

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFB0200602]
  2. project of Guangzhou Science and Technology [201802010043, 201807010058]
  3. Foundation of Key Laboratory of Machine Intelligence and Advanced Computing of the Ministry of Education [MSC-201604A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To defend against internal attacks in wireless sensor networks (WSNs), building a trust model between sensors nodes has been proved to be an effective way in this paper. The most current trust models only consider communication behavior when calculating direct trust, which is directly calculated based on the interactions between sensor nodes. However, this is not enough because of the various types of attacks. Furthermore, the adverse effect of poor-quality links on the trust value of normal nodes is not discussed in the current trust models. In this paper, we propose a beta and link quality indicator (LQI)-based trust model (BLTM) for the WSNs. First, communication trust, energy trust, and data trust are considered when calculating direct trust. Then, the weight of communication trust, energy trust, and data trust are discussed. Finally, an LQI analysis mechanism is proposed to maintain the accuracy and stability of the trust value of normal nodes in a network with poor-quality links. Compared with other models, e.g., beta-based trust and reputation evaluation system (BTRES), the simulation results show that the BLTM can defend against internal attacks, e.g., DoS attack and data tampering attack which the BTRES cannot resist and can reduce the adverse effect of poor-quality links on the trust value of normal nodes effectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available