4.6 Review

Comparison of blockchain platforms: a systematic review and healthcare examples

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocy185

Keywords

blockchain; distributed ledger technology; systematic review; PRISMA; health and Medicine

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [OT3OD025462]
  2. UCSD STARS Program
  3. iDASH Summer Internship Program - National Institutes of Health [T15LM11271]
  4. National Human Genome Research Institute of the National Institutes of Health [K99/R00HG009680]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To introduce healthcare or biomedical blockchain applications and their underlying blockchain platforms, compare popular blockchain platforms using a systematic review method, and provide a reference for selection of a suitable blockchain platform given requirements and technical features that are common in healthcare and biomedical research applications. Target audience: Healthcare or clinical informatics researchers and software engineers who would like to learn about the important technical features of different blockchain platforms to design and implement blockchain-based health informatics applications. Scope: Covered topics include (1) a brief introduction to healthcare or biomedical blockchain applications and the benefits to adopt blockchain; (2) a description of key features of underlying blockchain platforms in healthcare applications; (3) development of a method for systematic review of technology, based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement, to investigate blockchain platforms for healthcare and medicine applications; (4) a review of 21 healthcare-related technical features of 10 popular blockchain platforms; and (5) a discussion of findings and limitations of the review.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available