4.5 Article

Disability in Patients With End- Stage Liver Disease: Results From the Functional Assessment in Liver Transplantation Study

Journal

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 292-298

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lt.24684

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. American College of Gastroenterology Junior Faculty Development Award [P30AG044281]
  2. University of California, San Francisco Older Americans Independence Center
  3. Paul B. Beeson Career Development Award in Aging Research [K23AG048337]
  4. National Institutes of Health Grant for Clinical and Translational Science Training [TL1 TR000144]
  5. National Institute on Aging Grants for Early Medical and Surgical Subspecialists' Transition to Aging Research [R03AG045072]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cirrhosis leads to sarcopenia and functional decline that can severely impact one's ability to function at home and in society. Self-reported disability scales to quantify disabilityActivities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)are validated to predict mortality in older adults. To evaluate disability in liver transplantation (LT) candidates and quantify its impact on outcomes, consecutive outpatients 18 years listed for LT with laboratory Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores of 12 at a single high-volume US LT center were assessed for ADLs and IADLs during clinic visits. Multivariate competing risk models explored the effect of disabilities on wait-list mortality (death or delisting for illness). Of 458 patients, 36% were women, median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 60 years (IQR, 54-64 years), and initial Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) was 17 (IQR 14-20). At first visit, 31% had lost1 ADL, and 40% had lost1 IADL. The most prevalent ADL deficits lost were continence (22%), dressing (12%), and transferring (11%); the most prevalent IADLs lost were shopping (28%), food preparation (23%), and medication management (22%). After adjustment for age, MELD-Na, and encephalopathy, dressing (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-2.8; P=0.04), toileting (SHR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5; P=0.03), transferring (SHR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0; P=0.009), housekeeping (SHR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-3.0; P=0.009), and laundry (SHR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.5; P=0.002) remained independent predictors of wait-list mortality. In conclusion, ADL/IADL deficits are common in LT candidates. LT candidates would benefit from chronic disease management programs developed to address the impact of cirrhosis on their daily lives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available