4.6 Article

The genetic link between the Azores Archipelago and the Southern Azores Seamount Chain (SASC): The elemental, isotopic and chronological evidences

Journal

LITHOS
Volume 294, Issue -, Pages 133-146

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2017.08.019

Keywords

Ocean Islands Basalts; Azores mantle source; Southern Azores Seamount Chain; Mid-Atlantic Ridge

Funding

  1. Task Group for the Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf (EMEPC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New geochemical, isotopic (Sr-Nd-Hf-Pb) and K-Ar data, are presented here on samples from the Southern Azores Seamount Chain (SASC) located south of the Azores Plateau. The SASC also includes the Great Meteor, Small Meteor and Closs seamounts, morphologically connected by a saddle at -4100 m deep. We conclude that the SASC are characterized by a narrow isotopic variability that falls within the Azores isotopic field. Although each seamount has its own isotopic signature, their mantle source must comprise four local mantle end-members, three of which are common to the Azores, e.g. Plato isotopic signature results from the mixing between HIMU and N-MORB while Great Meteor signature results from this mix with the Azores Common Component (AzCC). A fourth end-member with high Pb-208/Pb-204 and decoupled Th/U ratios (Delta 8/4 up to 59.2) is identified on Great Meteor northern flank. New K-Ar ages on Plato (33.4 +/- 0.5 Ma) and Small Hyeres (31.6 +/- 0.4 Ma) show nearly coeval volcanism, which is contemporaneous with the E-MORBs erupted at the MAR, drilled on oceanic crust with 30-34 Ma (DSDP82). This study endorses the genetic link between the Azores Archipelago and the SASC to the long-term activity of the Azores plume and the large-scale ridge-hotspot interaction, contributing to better constrain the temporal-spatial evolution of this region of the North Atlantic. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available