4.6 Article

Nitrogen removal processes in deep subsurface wastewater infiltration systems

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages 275-283

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.01.008

Keywords

Deep subsurface wastewater infiltration system; Nitrogen removal; Denitrification; Organic composition variation

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation [51208485]
  2. National Environmental Protection Public Welfare Science and Technology Research Program of China [201109024]
  3. Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2015BAL04B01, 2012BAJ21B06, 2012BAJ21B04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To determine nitrogen removal methods and the factors that limit denitrifying reactions during the sewage purification processes in deep subsurface wastewater infiltration systems, an organic glass column with a radius of 0.30 m and a height of 2.00 m was loaded with layers of soil from the Shunyi district of Beijing. Good performance was achieved under a hydraulic loading of 8 cm/d. In addition, TP was nearly removed, and the effluent NH4+-N, TN, and COD concentrations were 0.14, 11.2, and 16.0mgL (1), respectively. Correspondingly, the removal efficiencies of NH4+-N, TN, COD and TP were 99.77, 83.68, 95.86 and 99.98%, respectively. According to the nitrogen variations with depth, 30.55% of the nitrogen missed at depths of up to 1.30 m. A mass-balance and phylogenetic analysis indicated that completely autotrophic nitrogen-removal over nitrite (CANON) occurred. Furthermore, 47.54% of the NH4+-N participated in CANON, and the remaining NH4+-N played a role in nitrification. At depths of more than 1.30 m, nitrogen was mainly removed by denitrification. In the process of denitrification, the change in the COD and the three-dimensional fluorescence spectra indicated that refractory organics could be used as a carbon source for denitrification. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available