4.6 Article

EVALUATE PUBLIC-PRIVATE-PARTNERSHIP'S ADVANCEMENT USING DOUBLE HIERARCHY HESITANT FUZZY LINGUISTIC PROMETHEE WITH SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE INFORMATION FROM STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVE

Journal

TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 386-420

Publisher

VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECH UNIV
DOI: 10.3846/tede.2019.7588

Keywords

Public-Private-Partnership; double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set; PRO-METHEE; subjective and objective information fusion

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71571123, 71532007, 71771155]
  2. Major Program of the National Social Science Fund of China [17ZDA092]
  3. China Scholarship Council [201806240059]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) as an efficient mode to provide public services through the government and social capital's cooperation has been in China for more than 30 years. In this paper, we propose an approach to evaluate PPP's advancement in different areas based on the subjective and objective information fusion. At first, we establish an index system from the perspective of the stakeholder. Then, considering that double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (DHHFLTS) that has two hierarchies of linguistic term sets can describe the subjective linguistic information more accurately, it is applied in the paper to depict the subjective information. By applying the entropy of the DHHFLTS, a programming model is proposed to derive the attribute weight through combining subjective evaluation with objective data. In addition, we develop the double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic PROMETHEE combining the subjective and objective information (DHHFL-PROMETHEE-S&O) method. At last, we illustrate the index system and the method with the PPP's advancement evaluation problem, and we can find the best choice based on the ranking result. Meanwhile, we also find that the objective information and the subjective information are complementary in the evaluation process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available