4.5 Review

Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training on glycemic control and cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 575-593

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40520-018-1012-z

Keywords

High-intensity interval training; Glycemic control; Cardiorespiratory fitness; Type 2 diabetes

Funding

  1. National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science of China [18BTY075]
  2. Social Science and Humanity on Young Fund of the Ministry of education of China [13yjc890050]
  3. Department of Education of Guangdong Province [2015KTSCX079]
  4. Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province [2015A020219010, 2014A020220010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on glycemic control and cardiorespiratory fitness compared with moderate-intensity training (MICT) and no training at all in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).MethodsRelevant articles were sourced from PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science, EBSCO, and the Cochrane Library. Randomized-controlled trials were included based upon the following criteria: participants were clinically diagnosed with T2D, outcomes that included glycemic control (e.g., hemoglobin A1c); body composition (e.g., body weight); cardiorespiratory fitness (e.g., VO2peak) are measured at baseline and post-intervention and compared with either a MICT or control group.ResultsThirteen trials involving 345 patients were finally identified. HIIT elicited a significant reduction in BMI, body fat, HbA1c, fasting insulin, and VO2peak in patients with type 2 diabetes. Regarding changes in the body composition of patients, HIIT showed a great improvement in body weight (mean difference: -1.22kg, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.23 to -0.18, P=0.02) and body mass index (mean difference: -0.40kg/m(2), 95% CI -0.78 to -0.02, P=0.04) than MICT did. Similar results were also found with respect to HbA1c (mean difference: -0.37, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.19, P<0.0001); relative VO2peak (mean difference: 3.37ml/kg/min, 95% CI 1.88 to 4.87, P<0.0001); absolute VO2peak (mean difference: 0.37L/min, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.45, P<0.00001).ConclusionsHIIT may induce more positive effects in cardiopulmonary fitness than MICT in T2D patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available