4.6 Article

Response of a tidal operated constructed wetland to sudden organic and ammonium loading changes in treating high strength artificial wastewater

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages 643-648

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.05.040

Keywords

Tidal operated constructed wetlands; Influent sudden loading; High strength wastewater; Buffering capacity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Funds [51308536]
  2. Research Fund for International Young Scientists [51450110434]
  3. Beijing Nova program [2015B083]
  4. Beijing Science and Technology Project [Z151100001115010, D141100001214002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The knowledge on the response of tidal-operated constructed wetlands (CWs) to suddenly changed influent characteristics, such as ammonium and organic matter concentrations, remains unclear. This study set up a pilot-scale tidal-operated CW and examined its response to various sudden organic matter and ammonium loading changes under constant hydraulic loading rate and retention time. Results showed an oxidative condition in the wetland bed with a high oxygen transfer rate induced by tidal operation. Effluent ammonium fluctuated from 0.5 mg/L to 62 mg/L when the ammonium pulse loadings were adopted, indicating the limited buffering capacity of tidal-operated CWs to influent ammonium pulse loadings because of the short contact time. No negative influence from influent COD pulse loadings to nitrification was observed, even when the influent COD concentration increased up to 1200 mg/L. The average constant effluent COD concentrations of 47 mg/L and high removal efficiencies of 93% under various pulse loadings (300-1200 mg/L) strongly indicated the high buffering capacity of tidal-operated CWs to suddenly changed organic matter loadings as well as its high degradation capacity driven by the enhanced oxygen transfer rate of tidal operation. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available