4.3 Article

Erythropoietin administration is associated with improved T-cell properties in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

Journal

LEUKEMIA RESEARCH
Volume 52, Issue -, Pages 20-27

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2016.11.002

Keywords

Myelodysplastic syndrome; Erythropoietin; Immune modulation; T cells; Lymphocytes

Funding

  1. Israel Cancer Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The immune system is impaired in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and plays a role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Here we show effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) on T cell (CD4(+), CD8(+) and CD4(+)CD25(+)) number and function in MDS patients. Healthy (20 subjects), MDS patients without rHuEPO treatment ('MDS', 13), and MDS patients treated with rHuEPO ('MDS+EPO', 17) were examined. CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell numbers were reduced and increased respectively in MDS compared to healthy subjects. EPO treatment normalized these levels. CD4(+)CD25(+) cell numbers, lower in MDS, were normalized in MDS+EPO. In vitro activation of CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells with phytohemagglutinin as measured by CD69 expression, demonstrated a 7.2 fold increase in CD4(+) activation vs 13.6 fold for MDS and MDS+EPO respectively (p=0.004); and 10.2 fold (MDS) vs 18.6 fold (MDS+EPO, p < 0.003) for CD8(+) T cells. Expression of the co-stimulatory marker CD28, decreased in CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in MDS, was normalized in MDS+EPO CD4(+) T cells. Subgroup analysis of milder disease (WHO RA and RARS) and more advanced disease revealed no difference in CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell numbers. However, the activation of these cells in the RA/RARS subgroup was impaired in EPO-untreated and enhanced in EPO-treated MDS patients. Our data suggest that EPO treatment improves immune abnormalities in MDS and may depend on disease severity. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available